Scripture

Early Church

Early Middle Ages

  • Primasius (d. c. 560)
  • John of Damascus (c. 675 or 676 – 749)
  • Rabanus Maurus Magnentius (c. 780 – 856)
  • Walafrid (i.e. Walafridus) Strabo (c. 808 – 849)
  • Sedulius Scotus (fl. 840–860)
  • Haymo of Halberstadt (d. 853)
  • Oecumenius (writing c. 990)

Late Middle Ages

  • Lanfranc (1005 to 1010 – 1089)
  • Bruno of Cologne (c. 1030–1101)
  • Anselm of Canterbury (c. 1033 – 1109)
  • Theophylact of Ohrid (1055-1107)
  • Hugo of St. Victor (c. 1096 – 1141)
  • Alulfus of Tournai (d. 1140’s)
  • Peter Lombard (1096 – 1160)
  • Hugo of Saint Caro (d. 1263)
  • Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274)
  • De Lyra, Nicholas (d. 1349)
  • Denis the Carthusian (1402 – 1471)
  • Laurentius Vallo (c. 1407 – 1457)

Early Modern Period

Late Modern Period

Recent

Sources

Notes on Interpretation

  • “Some of the commentators who appeal to ‘custom’ also find something fitting in the custom, and some of them go further so as to state the obligatory nature of the custom because of the reference to the angels. We see both of these points, for example, in the comments of Diodati. On verse 5, ‘it is fitting that custom should second nature now nature hath given a woman the natural vail of the hair wherefore she is obliged to make use of the other artificial vail to cover her head, which a woman ought to hold to be as proper for her as her natural vail of hair.’ And on verse 10, supposing men gave permission for women to cast off their covering, Diodati comments, ‘The Apostle answereth; though men would give consent to this disorder, yet the Angels who are continual guardians of the Church, and assistants in their assembles, they would be offended at it.’ The fact Diodati maintained the covering of the head was a ‘custom,’ and yet gave further reasons for the fitness of the ‘custom,’ indicates to us that the subject is not as simple as finding the term ‘custom’ in the text of a commentator.” (Matthew Winzer)
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started